According to a source close to the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle that there are individuals effectively kept her from reacting to stuff that they knew to be false

Meghan Markle was left disappointed by how the castle dealt with “false” newspaper stories, says a source.

Court archives that surfaced a week ago as a major aspect of Meghan and Prince Harry’s claim against a British media organization uncovered that the Duchess of Sussex felt incapable to shield herself against media interruption.

“The go-to position [at the palace] was no remark or to overlook stories, and individuals effectively kept her from reacting to stuff that we knew to be false,” a source near Meghan and Harry tells PEOPLE in the current week’s issue. “That is the thing that she is disagreeing with.”

The new archives documented by Meghan’s legitimate group guaranteed that the bogus reports caused “huge enthusiastic trouble and harm to her emotional well-being,” leaving her inclination “unprotected by the foundation and disallowed from safeguarding herself” during her pregnancy with 1-year-old son Archie.


A source with close information on the functions of the illustrious family discloses to PEOPLE that the imperial family ancestry’s of quiet on reports originates from their longing to not uplift the circumstance.

“The palace groups are confronted with the trouble that when things turn out badly — especially on private life matters — frequently any activity taken with the media exacerbates it,” says the source. “It isn’t so much that the illustrious family unit wouldn’t like to help — more than they would prefer not to aggravate it by giving a gossipy story more oxygen.”


In February 2019 five of Meghan’s dear companions addressed PEOPLE about the “worldwide harassing” they said was focused on the Duchess of Sussex. “As her companions had never observed her in this state, they were appropriately worried for her government assistance,” express the new court papers.

The source near Meghan and Harry noticed that the comments in the reports are not focused on the illustrious family. “A few people are making [these documents] about people. It is about the [institution] all in all and its practices.”

Meghan, 38, issuing distributers Associated Newspapers and the Mail on Sunday for distributing concentrates of what she depicts as a “private and secret” letter sent to her dad, Thomas Markle, in August 2018 — a quarter of a year after her wedding to Prince Harry, 35.

“This case focuses on a private and manually written letter from a little girl to her dad that was distributed by The Mail on Sunday,” a source near the couple tells PEOPLE. “This gross infringement of any individual’s entitlement to protection is evident and unlawful.”

LONDON, ENGLAND – MARCH 05: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex announces an award during the annual Endeavour Fund Awards at Mansion House on March 5, 2020 in London, England. Their Royal Highnesses will celebrate the achievements of wounded, injured and sick servicemen and women who have taken part in remarkable sporting and adventure challenges over the last year. (Photo by Paul Edwards – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Following a pre-preliminary hearing in April — to which Meghan and Harry tuned in from their home in Los Angeles, where they moved in the wake of venturing down from their senior jobs in the imperial family — the legitimate case will concentrate on whether the Mail on Sunday encroached on Meghan’s security and U.K. laws encompassing copyright and information insurance by printing selections of a transcribed letter she sent to her dad in August 2018.

The claim is relied upon to attend a full-court date in late 2020 or mid-2021.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here